Matchup · unreleased, due Coming soon

Can the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT run Lords of the Fallen II?

Yes, below recommended

Yes, below the recommended spec: the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT clears Lords of the Fallen II's minimum but not its recommended card. Expect about 31 FPS at 1080p on high; reaching 60 needs lower settings than low, or upscaling. Its 8 GB of video memory is under the 16 GB the recommended spec lists.

Frame rate by resolution

  • 1080p 31 FPS on high 60 FPS out of reach
  • 1440p 19 FPS on high 60 FPS out of reach
  • 4K 11 FPS on high 60 FPS out of reach

Modelled at native resolution, paired with the Intel Core i5-8600K or a faster processor. How the model works.

Next to the publisher’s spec

Minimum

NVIDIA RTX-2060 / AMD Radeon RX 5700

Index
27
Video memory
8 GB
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT clears it

Recommended

NVIDIA RTX-3080 / AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

Index
50
Video memory
16 GB
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT falls short

Your card

AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

Index
27
Video memory
8 GB
FSR

Same game, neighbouring cards

AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT and Lords of the Fallen II: questions

Can the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT run Lords of the Fallen II?

Yes, below the recommended spec: the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT clears Lords of the Fallen II's minimum but not its recommended card. Expect about 31 FPS at 1080p on high; reaching 60 needs lower settings than low, or upscaling. Its 8 GB of video memory is under the 16 GB the recommended spec lists.

How many FPS does the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT get in Lords of the Fallen II?

Modelled on high settings without upscaling: 31 FPS at 1080p, 19 at 1440p and 11 at 4K, with a processor that meets the game's recommendation.

Which card would run Lords of the Fallen II at the recommended spec?

The lowest launch price among recent cards that meet it belongs to the AMD Radeon RX 9070 ($549).

Does my processor change this?

The figures assume a processor at or above Lords of the Fallen II's recommendation. A slower one lowers the ceiling, most noticeably at 1080p.